Everyday Wi-Fi Public
As I begin to write this I have just ended a Skype video call with my mother who is connected wirelessly to the internet from a desk she is reading at in the Burlington Public Library in Ontario, Canada. For much of this year it has been somewhat of a morning ritual to visit here, my favourite café on campus to enjoy a coffee (or three) whilst catching up with others before I venture into my department for the day. Of course, I do not just mean ‘others’ in a physically co-present sense (although that is still a large part of the reason why I visit the café), rather, friends, family and colleagues whom opportunistically happen to be online at the same time. You see, I am also connected wirelessly to the internet thanks to campus-wide Wi-Fi coverage. At the same time that I was speaking with Mom I flicked between browser tabs, simultaneously engaged in conversation with a fellow doctoral student on Facebook Chat and two additional popups flashed open blinking orange indicating two more of my friends were speaking to me through Gmail’s integrated chat feature.
It shouldn’t be discounted either, the face-to-face interactions that were also taking place as they so frequently do. Serendipitous encounters with strangers are common-place in this café with its long shared concrete outdoor tables. I jump up to hand a fellow patron their jacket that was accidentally left draped over a chair. I’m also consciously listening over my shoulder to the next table where a man is complaining to his friend about a flatmate who is up all night making noise. On this particular morning, much to my surprise, Harry, the café’s owner comes out to greet me with a Christmas card and gift to thank me for my custom over the years. Our Skype call is finished short because at Mom’s end it seems that other users of the public library trying to do their work were being disturbed by her chatter. As I clicked the large circular red button to terminate the video call, a colleague I’d been expecting arrives at my table for our meeting.
I do not wish to imply that the above experience is anything other than mundane in today’s urban environment. However, it does serve to place my experience firmly into the category of Wi-Fi users that Hampton and Gupta (2008) have termed ‘placemakers’ in a recent article I’ve been reading. Through their study of Wi-Fi use in public (and semi-public) spaces, Hampton and Gupta (2008: 836) contend that when considering the widespread availability of publicly accessible Wi-Fi one is inevitably faced with to two contrasting (though not mutually exclusive) viewpoints:
1) That publicly accessible Wi-Fi will encourage greater participation in public spaces and in turn lead to more diversified and enriched social networks
2) Or, Wi-Fi use will follow the existing trend of mobile phone users to facilitate “private cocoons of interaction that benefit existing close ties”
The thing I’m struggling with in the context of my project you see, is that even the appropration of space for private means – ‘networked individualism’ (Wellman), still represents to me affect, performed in a particulare space. How are we enacting the world? well, I dunno, but even private ‘cocoons’ of internet use is an engagement of public space. No?
anyways. things to think about as I leave this desk for a summer break.
Not that I deserve a summer break, but the time has come, and everyone else will disappear, at least for a while.
Next post will be a little more personal I think – keepin’ it research related here for the sake of tags/categories – something I’ve never been good at.




Hey Alex,
Living in London where a public (or unlocked) wifi signal is never more than a street away at the most and mobile data is inexpensive it’s a city of ubiquitous connectivity.
People live online in such an habitual way; even when together they’ll be updating their status, checking out the latest photos online or tweeting their current thought… all in the company of the folks they had actually managed to plan to be with. But there still is a certain degree of shared experience to it.
I feel that mobile/wifi connectivity it likely to impact social interaction in much the same way the mobile phone has radically changed our interaction, for example it’s possible to make and change plans instantly where as before one had to make (and stick) to plans.
But as technology improves, internet speeds up and costs come down I like to predict that rather than detract from the physical environment connectivity will act to enhance it – or augment it as I’ve heard it said. People will become comfortable with hanging out in groups, both virtually and physically, simultaneously. The digital world and physical surroundings will merge, real will become blurred.
But it’ll take a while – remember how basic and bulky cell phones were like in the beginning – well imagine if our displays shrunk like they have?
Miles
Also… from an old post of mine propositioning how the changing UI of computers will evolve the way we use them… including how social they are.
Hey Miles
. You’ve inspired my to write thoughtfully and with passion! – I feel as though because I’ve just started this blog I’ve just been padding it out with whatever springs to mind. More effort needed! note taken.
Thanks for your comments. I didn’t realise you were blogging in such a related field – I’ve just spent the morning buried in your writings. It was great
I’m envious of your situation in London. I wish it was easier back here in NZ to get some sort of momentum behind bandwidth sharing etc. Perhaps I shall visit London later in 2009 if my finances allow for it.
I totally hear you on the seamlessness of digital and physical realms. For the past year I’ve been trying to come to terms with how this is represented in geographic theory, science and technology studies etc.
Although it is bandied about in the popular (and academic!) literature, I’m always uncomfortable with the term ‘ubiquitous’ when it comes to ICTs, particularly Wi-Fi. Sure, digital and physical realms are inseparably intertwined, but I’m fascinated by the geographies of wireless ICTs in the sense that they are extremely place-dependent – relying on physical infrastructures and real people on real physical places for their operation.
Yeah, social interaction definitely altered by ‘ubiquity’ and the web2.0 phenomenon, but I try and tell myself that Wi-Fi might not follow the dominant trend in the literatures which is a spiral towards privatism and maintainence of only a few close existing social ties.
I’m fascinated by the ability of a local wireless network to connect its local users together and provide a forum that might be condusive to building a local community, extending a public, as well as facilitating access to all that we might need to consume online.
I guess at the end of the day, what, with all these blurring boundaries of public and private, digital and physical, I’m trying to come to grips with what that means for the spaces that we have traditionally conceived as public.
If the public realm and public spaces are considered essential elements of human life and a healthy society (which i’m sure they are), then I think it’s important to explore in these new digital times where exactly the public is located
Choice. Small netbook keys plus unreliable 3g connection = I hope that the above makes sense!
alex