(re)Imagining the City

2010 January 18
by C. Alex de Freitas

Back when I was a fresh and enthusiastic undergrad penned a blog ‘Imagining the City‘. There, I tried to churn some thoughts on the city and the spaces I was surrounded by on a daily basis. It aimed to be a blog about space. Space is definitely a central interest of mine. Anyways. Imagining the City kind of died and as I worked my way up the university ranks I began this blog as a way of taking my lonely PhD path beyond the dusty confines of the (shared) office walls.

I think it has been working. I’m sorry for the lack of posts lately. Often I feel as though I am quite the writer. However, for the last few months – not so much. I’m sure my motivation will come back. After all, there are so many exciting things happening around me. And it’s nice, two years in….to be able to look back and smile that I’ve actually achieved something.

To cut to the chase. Imagining the City is back. I love to take photos….and Flickr just wasn’t cutting it. I needed somewhere I could post my favorites. Somewhere they could sit in a relatively large size….away from cluttered text or sidebars or links or colors. I’ve stocked it up with a few posts to whet your appetite…but please add it to your reader. I’ll still be here, of course….but there is where you can really see who I am. Where I am. Who I wish I could be….and all that stuff.

Sure, here I imagine space in one sense….but there is where my imagination can be brought just slightly more to life.

imaginingthecity.blogspot.com

Christmas Photo Project

2009 December 24

12 or so days ago, Amber, Lisa and I set out on a Christmas photo project. The task was simple. To each get ourselves a disposable camera and take two photographs per day for the twelve days of Christmas. Other than that, we didn’t really set out any other guidelines. To tell you the truth, I don’t think I have even used a disposable camera ever in my life before! I didn’t even know what to do when it came time to get it developed….take the film out!?…leave it in!?

But in the end, all worked out well. I may have cheated in the project a little, because I actually used two separate cameras…my little Fuji disposable….and my favourite ol’ timer the Olympus Trip 35. I just didn’t cart the disposable camera around with me at all times with discipline like a true photographer would. However, for some reason, I always have my Trip 35 slung over my shoulder.

So, without further ado, I present to you my 12 days of Christmas in 24 photos. Each day is represented by one shot from the disposable, and one shot from the Olympus Trip 35. If you really want, you can see all the other rejects from the disposable camera at the full set on my Flickr page. And gazillions of photos from my Trip 35 here at this set.

Merry Christmas everyone!

Feel free to let me know how I did!….Film is fun…but prohibitively expensive to develop!

Amber’s photos can be found at her website HERE.

I will post a link to Lisa’s ASAP.

Day One: Crowds & Ships in the Storm

Day Two: Two different bikes

Day Three: Sunsets and Pizza

Day Four: Picnicking in the park and Seabirds

Day Five: Native Trees and Architecture

Day Six: We took these at the exact same instant :-) (ok, we did two takes…that’s why our cameras are at different angles – and I cropped too, whatcha gonna do!?)

Day Seven: Puppies and Rooftops

Day Eight: Bird’s Eye Lunch and Domestic Goddess Mom

Day Nine: Fisherman and Ducklings

Day Ten: Santa and Nephew Isaiah

Day Eleven: City by both sea and land

Day Twelve: Beach and home again…

The city most worthy of attention is the city that you happen to find yourself in right now…

2009 December 1
by C. Alex de Freitas

I was recently given the task of writing just 200 words. That is not very much at all. 200 words is restricting. Yet, 200 words is also refreshing. Below is what happened to come out:


 

There’s building site just off Ponsonby Rd that I like to ride by whenever I get the chance. Lately there are never any workers there though. Construction must have halted due to a ‘recession’ or something like that. It’s for the best though because no-one really wants a Titanic shopping mall complex just behind their favourite café strip, right? The giant hole in the ground is fascinating; at the bottom of the hole someone has painted the phrase, “I wish this was a swimming pool”. Don’t you wish that was true? I love it when street art is right – when it speaks what you were already thinking anyway.

As I peered deep into the hole and imagined what it was asking me to, I snapped a photo. I was on my own, but the act reminded me that everything about my city was encouraging me to get out and be in it. To wander freely the streets and take in what was going on. Cities never sleep, Auckland is no exception – you just have to look a little harder. It’s a performance, just without the stage. I rode my bicycle much further that night and my city played with me.

as always. more photos can be found at my Flickr.

A little maintenance here and there

2009 November 15
by C. Alex de Freitas

Hello my dear readers. It’s been a busy past few weeks, but I won’t complain – I know we are all struggling to keep our heads above water in some way or another. I’m just thankful you’ve taken a few seconds to check on what I’m up to.

All I wanted to say is that I have bigger plans for this blog. I want to post more frequently, and more broadly. I want to post photographs and things that inspire me in research and just in everyday life.

Needless to say….my theme sucked. But with that said…I’m not willing to take the plunge to a self-hosted WordPress blog.

So, over the next few days I’m just going to be updating a few dusty corners of this site. Brightening it up. Making it a little more readable, and as a result, perhaps breathing into it a little more life.

I hope you stick with me. And you can expect to be hearing from me soon.

I leave you with a photo I took last week at a wrecking yard on the way home from Ohakune where we were lucky enough to catch the last day snowboarding of the season. It was good!

forblog

What one does after a week without Twitter

2009 October 27

Thankfully, my Twitter account has been unsuspended. Hooray!

After being suspended I promptly contested the suspension through Twitter’s support page. To tell you the truth, I kind of had high expectations of Twitters support team. I told myself someone would fire back a message rather instantaneously and I would be back in business. However, this was not the case.

After a day of my request sitting there with the status informing it was yet to be assigned to a support person I decided I best submit another. This time I used the ’support’ email address. Almost another day passed until I heard anything from them. I rejoiced at the new message from Twitter in my inbox, but opening it revealed all they were telling me is that they were deleting my ‘duplicate’ request so that my initial request may be ‘processed’ faster. The message told me the suspension could be a minimum of 30 days. Wtf? Would someone just please respond. Acknowledge you’ve got my request, even.

On day three I began commenting on my initial message. Each day my comments would become increasingly urgent.

It was around day four that I forgot what they had told me about submitting multiple requests. I submitted a bunch more…with words like HELP, and I’ve been WRONGLY SUSPENDED in large capitals. I even started a temporary account called @HelpImSuspended. I used this to message BiZ Stone himself, message @spam to tell them I’m NOT spam and to plea to anyone at all that I’d been wrongly suspended!

Anyways. One of these methods must have worked, because a lovely Twitter employee named ‘Ginger’ messaged me back on the seventh day of my famine to let me know she had unsuspended my account – Hallelujah!

I really believe that Twitter has been a useful tool for my project. It has allowed me access to participants I would have never otherwise had the chance to be in touch with. More importantly though, like many others, I have become quite reliant on Twitter as a stream of information and communication with particular friends, colleagues and scholars. A week without Twitter was not a minor deal in my life. Many of my friends joked about its insignificance. Rather, I was unable to consume information in the ways that I have become so accustomed.

But you know what the worst part about it all was!? After Twitter unsuspended my account….I thought that all the stuff I’d missed would just become visible in my homepage stream. This was not the case! Any tweets posted while I was suspended were not delivered. What’s more…any tweets directed at me (@alexdefreitas) during that time, were rejected! This was a big bummer. Especially because the day before I was suspended I had just sent a bunch of messages to potential new participants in my study.

So the answer to what one does when they are back after a week suspended from Twitter? Well, I manually went through all of the (important) profiles I follow and scrolled through catching up on what had been said. While time consuming, at least I could rest knowing that links shared….reports linked to…scholarly banter had not gone on without me.

Don’t underestimate the power of Twitter as a research tool. There are even conference workshops approaching that address microblogging like Twitter. I chose to use my personal account for my research as that is the way I would approach someone physically and ask them to take part in my study. I am not some far off researcher….just a person…another WiFi user. But I’m learning from the experience. My requests for people to participate started as a copy and pasted message. As it turns out…this is considered abuse of the @reply feature in Twitter’s terms and conditions. Now? well, I will have to make more of an effort to address people personally. This is fine, but it means the amount of people I can reach will drastically lower.

Needless to say. It’s been a fun experience this past year. Learning Twitter. Learning new cities. Learning ethnography. Justifying Twitter’s significance in the public realm and exploring the unseen ways we are going about our daily lives on mobiles and laptops. The more I think about it…the more I’m beginning to see first hand the ways in which the city is not a built, fixed, material thing….rather, a process, an experience…a performance.

Day two of life without Twitter

2009 October 21
by C. Alex de Freitas

I’m well into my second day without Twitter. The thing about being cut off by Twitter, is not that I can’t tweet, or message my friends. I can get over that. It’s that I can’t keep up to date with the daily stream of information the people I follow provide me with. These links to blogs and new people of interest are indispensable, and can’t be replicated in an RSS feed etc.

What shall I do when I finally get my feed back? Do I spend days reading back on all that I’ve missed!? Do I just forget it and move on?

I have sent multiple requests to Twitter advising them of my dilemma. I’ve done this through multiple avenues…contact pages…support email addresses etc. So far, no luck at all. Haven’t heard a peep. In a desperate attempt this morning, I started a new temporary twitter account and messaged Biz Stone. Like he will ever hear me though. He receives like 1000 @reply’s per minute.

The problem here is that I was not using a separate account to message potential participants. Instead, in line with my research, studying the technologies and practices that are so finely engrained into our daily lives, I used my personal Twitter account. An account that has been active for my own personal communications since early 2007!  Hopefully I hear from Twitter soon. My page is on lockdown!

My Twitter account just got suspended!

2009 October 20

account suspended

I wake up this morning to my worst nightmare. My Twitter account has been suspended! WTF?

The long story is that I have been collecting relevant tweets on my RSS reader. When there are a few sitting there, I reply to them and invite the tweeps to participate in my study by chatting to me a bit. Well, after all the travel and chaos over the last few months I didn’t have 30 or 40 tweets to reply to….I had 200+.

There’s two things that could have happened here. One is that Twitter might have automatically suspended my account for too much activity in one day. That would be fair enough. I never send more than a few tweets on any given day (apart from yesterday!). The other is that someone I approached reported me, or marked my tweet as spam. If that’s the case, it’s pretty stink of them…because I’ve been super friendly and made a bunch of friends and followers through my research in these digital worlds.

Anyway. I would have normally tweeted about something like this….but I’ve been cut off! It’s an odd feeling. Look at the numbers of my followers and following. I didn’t realize how much I needed it until it was gone :-(

I’ve sent the obligatory request to Twitter explaining to them that I think it was in error and I want my account back please, Mr. It’s only midday in LA right now….fingers crossed they can sort me out by this afternoon. Aarg.

This is where all the traditional ethnographers I know with their tape recorders and transcripts are smiling and quietly saying “I told you so”

Auckland, 2100 AD

2009 October 18

I think it’s necessary to begin this post on a personal note. In the month since I last wrote, my wife and I have wrapped up life in Toronto and headed back to NZ. It’s hard being back. The purpose of being in Toronto was to be close to public WiFi spots and people who use them regularly. For me to be able to use them regularly. To be near to inspirational and helpful people. A stone’s throw from New York City. Close to universities, conferences, exhibitions and academics I have been privileged enough to meet that, and lets be honest here, would probably have never responded to my email cries for help from oceans away. It’s hard being back because Toronto is a city that its citizens are proud of. I’m proud of Toronto. Determined to bring some of my T.O. back to my NZ.

topoftheworld

With that said, NZ rules too. In the photo above, taken just this weekend, my friend Tilly and I are on top of the world. Being back means it is time to take stock of what I’ve achieved over the past year. I’ve seen my methodology change its course one hundred and eighty degrees which is awesome. Over halfway into the three years I’m funded to do this, I can finally see some progression. It has been lonely, most days I just want to quit, but it feels just that little bit more possible right now. Time to account for it all in writing eh!?

The reason I’m here today though, is to begin posting more broadly. While this site must remain central to my PhD work, I feel like it’s time to begin writing a little further afield. After all, I’m not a technologist, nor do I particularly want to be 0ne. I’m a social scientist. A geographer, an urbanist, fascinated by cities, art, architecture, literature, photography, design and exploring the ways that our social lives collide in amongst it all. I want to start thinking more generally about my surroundings. When I was an undergraduate student, I published a blog called ‘Imagining the City‘. Maybe I should rename this site that, or at least give it some kind of a title other than my name…How boring.

Anyways, in line with expanding on what I think about here I present to you below some beautiful imaginations of Auckland in 2100 AD by students of the Media Design School. I came across them via Andy Hudson-Smith’s Digital Urban blog. It’s worth checking out more of them on the school’s Vimeo page, but I’ve embedded my favorites below. I’ve always said that we need to just make the most out of where we are now. I’ve never really spent that much time worrying about tomorrow. If these don’t challenge one to begin thinking about their city in new ways I don’t know what will. It’s the kind of stuff we frequently see applied to Los Angeles or New York City in film, but right here at home. Eerie visions of deserted streets and crumbled, overgrown Sky Towers. Rad. Choice work MDS students! What a great assignment. Especially check out Ravi’s wrecked Harbour Bridge (the third video).

The Invisible Publics

2009 September 17

The moment I was first inspired to pursue research on public WiFi came during my undergraduate studies. Writing an essay on geography and technology, my lazy trawling through Google Scholar results led me to a Master’s thesis, Unwiring New York, by Andrea Zoltanetzky (evidently, it’s not clickable as a document anymore. Weird). She wrote of how one could be on Bryant Park’s WiFi network without ever having stepped foot in the park. WiFi didn’t conform to traditional spatial boundaries. This fascinated the budding geographer inside me.

My interest with WiFi and mobile technologies continued into graduate studies. Here I discovered theory and methodological traditions that were beginning to think of city spaces as relational and layered; comprised of bodies and networks and things and flows of information. What’s more, ‘public space’ became a confusing term at best. Especially due to the conditions presented by these wireless technologies. To use a mobile phone or WiFi network, one must me firmly located in physical space, yet, the possibilities of also being connected elsewhere were seemingly infinite.

It was only when I began my doctoral research though, that I began to realize exactly how invisible these spaces were. For a social researcher, an ethnographer, whatever, this presented some unique challenges. My initial plan was basically to hang out in WiFi networks and spot people on laptops. I’d be able to chat to them about their experiences and how their use of the WiFi fitted into their daily life, perhaps, how it might change the way they negotiate the city and it’s public/private spaces. I wanted to gain a more nuanced understanding of personal experiences with technology, rather than conduct a generic survey of 100 or 1000 participants. Since every experience in space was unique, just following the lives of a handful of people would be more than enough.

The thing is, I couldn’t find them! I would sit for hours at coffee shops and public WiFi hotspots and only observe a handful of users. This problem seemed to be shared by others doing social research on WiFi – spots with few or no people to ‘observe’. Access to Wireless Toronto’s network statistics whilst hanging out in WiFi spots revealed to me that the number of connected users according to the statistics never matched up with the number of people I could see out in the park or cafe.

That’s when I realized I was going about things entirely the wrong way. Rather than find people in physical public spaces, I began to find them online. If you read this blog, then you see where I am going. An online ethnography, at least, an ethnography that was initiated by online participant observation quickly revealed the use of free WiFi across the globe in millions more spots than it would have ever been possible for me to sit and physically observe.

People weren’t only using WiFi from their laptops, that’s so 2005!…they were logging on from mobile phones, PDAs and an array of other portable devices! Recent research confirmed that iPhones and mobile devices were popular for logging onto free WiFi networks (even when paid 3G or mobile data was an option)….This was a pleasant surprise given that many of my peers snark at the prospect of free WiFi as they consume gigabyte’s of costly mobile data.

…And finally I could see. Right at this moment I am in Bryant Park. The first time I visited here I scanned the seating arrangements for laptops. When there were few or none, I just accepted it. Now my eyes see differently. I see the people perusing their iPhones and Blackberries, the groups of friends and the old dude reading the newspaper. I see the groundskeepers and the women in the great white tent preparing for Fashion Week. I know now it’s about more than what my eyes can see and these people can’t be discounted as wireless users or not, public or private. Some may not ever go online (or lack the means to do so). Some will sit online for hours. Others might connect just long enough to upload a latest Twitpic. Either way, free/open WiFi is far from everywhere. Even here, in New York, you can’t just log on from every street corner as some writers might lead you to believe. Public space is both as alive as ever, and as confused and contested as ever and understanding it necessitates the researcher’s presence both on and offline.

Just because you can’t see it, doesn’t mean that it’s not there. (is that a saying of some kind?)

Learning the great art of (online) ethnography

2009 September 15

Supposedly I am an apprentice of sorts. During my undergraduate studies someone once told me that the PhD is like undertaking an academic apprenticeship (and Google confirms that this is quite an established concept (see Green, 2005: 50)). Sure, I guess that sounds about right, but if this is indeed the case, I’m yet to figure out to whom I am an apprentice – who my guide/instructor/wise mentor/Mr Miyagi is. My supervisors/advisors I hear you say? – not in my experience. While I have been envious of those I’ve met along the way who research and publish alongside their advisors, that’s not my own experience at all. I’ve met people from MIT’s SENSEable City Lab , and a host of other schools that are dedicated to researching in the specific area of the PhDs – again, not my own experience at all.  I’m just here, rather blindly foraging on my own, given a couple of years, and expected to have it all together and figured out before the scholarship runs dry.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m doing this. I will get there. I rejoice the days I feel as though this thing is moving forwards….and I can’t bear to look back on months that pass and nothing seems to have changed. I am indeed grateful for the funding my school has given me….and when you think about it….I really have one of the more desireable ‘jobs’ around. I enjoy that feeling of my mind twisting and I love going to ‘work’. After all, I’m the one always telling people to do what they love (and quit if you don’t!) – and I can’t wait to get back to tutoring.

Regardless of who my teacher may be, I’ve been spending the meantime learning to take baby steps of my own. If I could have explained to you what my research was about at the beginning of the year (some of the dusty corners of this blog probably still do to some extent), it would be nothing at all like what I would tell you now. Most significantly of late, I’ve been teaching myself the ways of the ethnographer. You don’t learn this stuff in the undergraduate courses at university, maybe not even in a condensed year of Master’s research. The further I walk down this road, the more , for the most part, things begin to make sense – but time moves quickly in digital realms (Did you see what a central role Twitter played on the red carpet of last night’s MTV VMAs!?).

From early proposals with the intention of sitting in WiFi parks, approaching laptop users, then interviewing them and pressuring them to further communicate with me and provide me with things like photographs – my ethnography quickly led me online, into digital worlds and spaces already quite familiar to me where communications seem to occur more naturally. Unlike the social scientist who visits foreign civilisations and new worlds, my research space felt normal – a part of my existing everyday life. I needed a way to separate my ‘life’ from my ‘research’, or at least, a methodology that was sympathetic to my embedded position. It became less about arriving at a particular outcome, and more about exploring the ways in which I was  trying to get there. The real work lays in now understanding the effectiveness of my methodology as a tool for understanding social/spatial relationships as they might relate to existing theoretical currents – perhaps illuminating some potential shortcomings and/or suggesting a minor change or two.

I’m not sure where I was going with this post other than to point out the changes that take place as one goes about social research. Good social research. Messy social research. My ethnographic stroll has meant that I’ve been spending increasing amounts of time just ‘being’ in online public spaces as much as physical material ones. I realise that many people would disagree. Others perhaps don’t know it yet, but certain social media, especially Twitter, are very much like the more traditional conceptions of a public space. I’m not sure the academic literature has gone there at all yet. Indeed, it is talking and listening in public spaces that are perhaps the oldest form of democracy. These things are not disappearing, or a dying art. They are very much alive – the job of the ethnographer might be to show this to the others.

Slowly, I am learning the great art of ethnography. An ethnography that is by no means established; rather, one that is evolving and seems to provoke me as much as I attempt to shepherd it.